Explorer 2025 ST 400A vs EREV RWD Comparison

Car Information

6.8

/

/

1,152 km

/

3.63 kWh/L

Engine / Motor

180

/

6

/

Dimensions

7

5

20

/

5049

4,825

2004

1,980

1775

1,620

3025

2,940

515

/

Fuel Economy

11.3

/

67

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

7

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

13.2

/

/

/

14

/

B&O Sound System by Bang & Olufsen 980 Watt, 14 Speakers including Subwoofer

/

Transmission

10 Speed Selectshift Automatic

Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

255/55 R20

/

255/55 R20

/

Key Spec

3.0 L - 3.5 L

/

290 BHP - 400 BHP

/

10 Speed Automatic & 10 Speed Selectshift Automatic & Automatic & CVT

/

Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

7 - 7

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0

1.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

3.0L EcoBoost V6

/

400 BHP

310

563

367

/

1,152

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Explorer 2025 ST 400A

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Rollover stability control
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • EREV RWD

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickEREV RWD

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Explorer 2025 ST 400A if you care more about interior space; choose EREV RWD if you care more about power.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Ford | Explorer 2025 ST 400A

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln MKX 2021 2.7L Reserve (Tech Pack+Luxury Pack) AWD

    Ford | Explorer 2025 ST 400A

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln MKX 2020 2.7L Reserve (Tech Pack+Luxury Pack) AWD

    Ford | Explorer 2025 ST 400A

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln MKX 2019 2.7L Reserve (Tech Pack+Luxury Pack) AWD

    Ford | Explorer 2025 ST 400A

    VS

    Chevrolet | Tahoe LT

    Ford | Explorer 2025 ST 400A

    VS

    Volkswagen | Touareg Elegance 3.0L

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Explorer 2025 ST 400A has a fuel consumption of 8.85, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Explorer 2025 ST 400A has a wheelbase of 3025, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Explorer 2025 ST 400A, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Explorer 2025 ST 400A uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.