F 150 Raptor R vs Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180 km/h
8
4
5200 cc
1998 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5885 mm
5370 mm
2029 mm
1918 mm
1920 mm
1884 mm
3683 mm
3270 mm
1230 L
1200 L
216 m
230 m
Fuel Economy
5 Km/L
8 Km/L
80 L
80 L
5 Km/L
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Single
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
10
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
14
6
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 6.2 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
292 BHP - 770 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
Automatic & CVT
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 6 Seater
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
Halogen
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
5.2 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
720 BHP
168 BHP
868 Nm
405 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
F 150 Raptor R
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose F 150 Raptor R if you care more about interior space; choose Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, F 150 Raptor R has a fuel consumption of 20, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, F 150 Raptor R has a wheelbase of 3683 mm, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a wheelbase of 3270 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, F 150 Raptor R , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. F 150 Raptor R uses Four Wheel Drive, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) uses Four Wheel Drive.