F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) vs CX60 2025 High Plus Comparison
Car Information
/
450
Engine / Motor
217 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4746 mm
4740
2070 mm
1890
1664 mm
1686
2874 mm
/
650 L
/
/
20 Inch
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
/
63 L
/
13.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12 Inch
/
✓
/
12
/
Bose
Transmission
/
8-speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5.0 L
3.3 L
246 BHP - 550 BHP
280 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
246 BHP
284 BHP
365 Nm
/
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
CX60 2025 High Plus
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX60 2025 High Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) if you care more about overall equipment; choose CX60 2025 High Plus if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a wheelbase of 2874 mm, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) uses All Wheel Drive, while CX60 2025 High Plus uses Four-Wheel Drive.