F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 vs Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD AT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
8
4
5200 cc
1998 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5885
5370 mm
2029
1918 mm
1920
1884 mm
3683
3270 mm
1230
1200 L
216
230 m
Fuel Economy
5 Km/L
8 Km/L
80 L
80 L
5 Km/L
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Manual
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
12
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
14
6
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 6.2 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
292 BHP - 770 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
Automatic & CVT
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 6 Seater
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
5.2
2.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
720 BHP
168 BHP
868 Nm
405 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
F150 Raptor 5.2L V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD AT
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 if you care more about interior space; choose Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD AT if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 has a fuel consumption of 20, while Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD AT has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD AT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 has a wheelbase of 3683, while Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD AT has a wheelbase of 3270 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, F150 Raptor 5.2L V8, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 uses Four Wheel Drive, while Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD AT uses Four Wheel Drive.