F40 2.3T 6AT vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison
Car Information
165
/
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
6
/
2698 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
2
5 Seater
1915
/
4350
4800 mm
1925
1937 mm
1865
1962 mm
2465
2950 mm
520
562 L
210
260 m
37
/
31
/
24
/
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
75
79 L
/
9.2 Km/L
/
9.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
Full-size spare tire
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10
12
✓
/
✓
/
6
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
6AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Electronic part-time 4WD
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Double boom/helical spring front independent suspension
/
Five-bar/helical spring non-independent suspension
/
Separate frame construction
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Ventilated disc
/
Disc
/
265/65 R17 AT
/
265/65 R17 AT
/
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3T
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
165HP
330 BHP
380
/
/
V
/
4
/
542 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Snow/Sport mode；Comfort/Economy Mode
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
2.3 L - 2.7 L
/
270 BHP - 330 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
4 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
F40 2.3T 6AT
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Number of Airbags
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Bronco Badlands 2.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose F40 2.3T 6AT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, F40 2.3T 6AT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, F40 2.3T 6AT has a wheelbase of 2465, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bronco Badlands 2.7L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. F40 2.3T 6AT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.