CarteaCompare CarsF40 2.3T 6AT vs Tiggo 9 Comfort

F40 2.3T 6AT vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

165

189

/

8 s

/

390

/

4810*1925*1742

Dimensions

2

7

1915

/

4350

4810

1925

1925

1865

1742

2465

2800

520

/

210

/

37

/

31

/

24

/

/

19

Fuel Economy

75

/

/

13

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

12.3

10.25

/

/

Passenger Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

10.25"

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Triple

/

Safety

2

6

/

/

Full-size spare tire

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10

15.6

/

6

8

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

4

Transmission

6AT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Electronic part-time 4WD

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Double boom/helical spring front independent suspension

/

Five-bar/helical spring non-independent suspension

/

Separate frame construction

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated disc

/

Disc

/

265/65 R17 AT

/

265/65 R17 AT

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

-

221 BHP - 221 BHP

254 - 254

6AT & 8AT

AT & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

2

7

Exterior

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.3T

2.0L

Gasoline

Gasoline

165HP

254

380

/

/

Turbocharge

/

2.0T GDI

/

390

Technologies

/

/

/

Snow/Sport mode;Comfort/Economy Mode

Eco + Normal + Sport

/

/

/

/

19 ADAS Functions

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • F40 2.3T 6AT

    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Number of Airbags
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Tiggo 9 Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickF40 2.3T 6AT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose F40 2.3T 6AT if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

BAIC | F40 2.3T 6AT

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, F40 2.3T 6AT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, F40 2.3T 6AT has a wheelbase of 2465, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. F40 2.3T 6AT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.