Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 vs Jolion 1.5T Basic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Dimensions
6
5 Seater
19"
/
5 Doors
/
4720 mm
4468 mm
1865 mm
1841 mm
1710 mm
1619 mm
2785 mm
/
347 L
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
13.7 Km/L
58 L
55 L
12 Km/L
13.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
181 BHP
147 BHP
300 Nm
220 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
1.5 L - 1500 L
/
140 BHP - 147 BHP
/
Automatic & DCT
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dfsk Fengon 600 M1
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
- Child Lock
Jolion 1.5T Basic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJolion 1.5T Basic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 if you care more about power; choose Jolion 1.5T Basic if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Jolion 1.5T Basic has a fuel consumption of 7.3. Therefore, Jolion 1.5T Basic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 has a wheelbase of 2785 mm, while Jolion 1.5T Basic has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Jolion 1.5T Basic uses Front Wheel Drive.