Fengon IX7 vs Roewe D5X Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
200
Dimensions
7
5
20"
18"
/
4,700
/
1,890
/
1,664
/
2,765
Fuel Economy
10.9
21.6 km/L.
70
50
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Leather
fabric
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
Passenger Seat
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
24.6"
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson Independent
/
Rear Multi-link Independent
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
TBD
1.5T
231
141 + 181
AT
AT
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.5T
Gasoline
Hybrid
231
141 + 181
355
230 + 340
/
✓
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comfort / Standard / Sport
Motor
/
340
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery
/
181
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fengon IX7
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
Roewe D5X Comfort
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickFengon IX7
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fengon IX7 if you care more about price; choose Roewe D5X Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fengon IX7 has a fuel consumption of 9.17, while Roewe D5X Comfort has a fuel consumption of 4.63. Therefore, Roewe D5X Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fengon IX7 has a wheelbase of No data, while Roewe D5X Comfort has a wheelbase of 2,765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fengon IX7 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Roewe D5X Comfort uses Front Drive.