Figo 1.5L Trend H/B vs 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175 km/h
225 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
3796 mm
3657 mm
1686 mm
1647 mm
1527 mm
1485 mm
2489 mm
2300 mm
261 L
185 L
Fuel Economy
16.9 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
42 L
35 L
16.9 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 1.6 L
1.4 L
84 BHP - 110 BHP
180 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
180 BHP
136 Nm
250 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Figo 1.5L Trend H/B
- ABS
695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Figo 1.5L Trend H/B if you care more about interior space; choose 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Figo 1.5L Trend H/B has a fuel consumption of 5.92, while 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Figo 1.5L Trend H/B has a wheelbase of 2489 mm, while 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2300 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Figo 1.5L Trend H/B, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Figo 1.5L Trend H/B uses Front Wheel Drive, while 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top uses Front Wheel Drive.