Figo 1.5L Trend H/B vs Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3796 mm
/
1686 mm
/
1527 mm
/
2489 mm
/
261 L
/
Fuel Economy
16.9 Km/L
17.8
42 L
/
16.9 Km/L
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.4 L - 1.6 L
/
84 BHP - 110 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
151 BHP
136 Nm
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Figo 1.5L Trend H/B
- ABS
Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Figo 1.5L Trend H/B if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Figo 1.5L Trend H/B has a fuel consumption of 5.92, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a fuel consumption of 5.62. Therefore, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Figo 1.5L Trend H/B has a wheelbase of 2489 mm, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Figo 1.5L Trend H/B uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure uses No data.