Forthing V3 vs Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
150 km/h
Dimensions
Sliding Door
/
/
2 Seater
14"
/
4500
5413 mm
1710
2050 mm
2000
2254 mm
2850
3450 mm
/
options.11,500 L
Fuel Economy
14
13.3 Km/L
55
90 L
/
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Leaf Spring
/
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.5
2.2 L
Gasoline
Diesel
125
130 BHP
150
320 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.2 L - 2.2 L
/
130 BHP - 140
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Diesel
/
TBD
/
2 - 2
Comparison of configuration highlights
Forthing V3
- Parking sensor rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBoxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Forthing V3 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Forthing V3 has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Forthing V3 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Forthing V3 has a wheelbase of 2850, while Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) has a wheelbase of 3450 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Forthing V3 uses Front Drive, while Boxer 2.2L Diesel (L2H2) uses Front Wheel Drive.