Forthing V3 vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) Comparison
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
/
160
/
4
Dimensions
Sliding Door
/
/
13 Seater
14"
/
4500
5380
1710
1880
2000
2285
2850
3110
/
9800
Fuel Economy
14
9.5
55
70
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
5MT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Leaf Spring
/
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5
2.5 L - 3.5 L
125
88 BHP - 277
5MT
6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
TBD
3 - 13 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
125
149 BHP
150
240
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Forthing V3
- Parking sensor rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Temperature Display
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Related comparisons
Editor's PickToyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Forthing V3 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Forthing V3 has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, Forthing V3 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Forthing V3 has a wheelbase of 2850, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Forthing V3 uses Front Drive, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) uses Rear Wheel Drive.