Fortuner GX2 4X2 vs 900 2.0T Ultra Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
240
Dimensions
7 Seater
6
17
/
4795
5240
1855
1999
1835
1810
/
3160
Fuel Economy
10.3
/
80
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
275/45 R21
265/65 R17
275/45 R21
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
530 BHP - 540 BHP
6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
DHT
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
6
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
164 BHP
540 BHP
245
1038
✓
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X2
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
900 2.0T Ultra
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Door Reflectors
- Tire Repair Kit
- Pedestrian airbag
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X2 if you care more about overall equipment; choose 900 2.0T Ultra if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while 900 2.0T Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a wheelbase of No data, while 900 2.0T Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X2 uses Rear Drive, while 900 2.0T Ultra uses All Wheel Drive.