Fortuner GX2 4X2 vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4795
5209
1855
2010
1835
1731
/
3110
Fuel Economy
10.3
/
80
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
/
✓
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
/
147 BHP - 235 BHP
429 BHP
6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater
6 - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
164 BHP
429 BHP
245
600
✓
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X2
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickFortuner GX2 4X2
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X2 if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X2 uses Rear Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.