Fortuner GX2 4X2 vs Mazda CX5 2023 2.5L GTX (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
/
/
7.5
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
210
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
17
✓
4795
4.550
1855
1.840
1835
1.675
/
2.700
/
965
Fuel Economy
10.3
14.3
80
58
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
1.9 L - 2.5 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
151 BHP - 188 BHP
6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
164 BHP
188 BHP
245
251
✓
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X2
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Mazda CX5 2023 2.5L GTX (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X2 if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX5 2023 2.5L GTX (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while Mazda CX5 2023 2.5L GTX (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, Mazda CX5 2023 2.5L GTX (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a wheelbase of No data, while Mazda CX5 2023 2.5L GTX (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X2 uses Rear Drive, while Mazda CX5 2023 2.5L GTX (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.