Fortuner GX2 4X2 vs MG4 64KWh COM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
160
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
17
17
4795
/
1855
/
1835
/
Fuel Economy
10.3
/
80
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
Battery/Charging
/
140
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
/
Mc. Suspension, Front Mount EPS
/
5 link rear suspension
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
/
147 BHP - 235 BHP
168 BHP - 245
6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
400Km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
164 BHP
245
245
/
✓
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X2
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
MG4 64KWh COM
- Keyless Entry
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickFortuner GX2 4X2
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X2 if you care more about price; choose MG4 64KWh COM if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while MG4 64KWh COM has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a wheelbase of No data, while MG4 64KWh COM has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X2 uses Rear Drive, while MG4 64KWh COM uses No data.