Fortuner GX2 4X2 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4795
5115
1855
1980
1835
1920
Fuel Economy
10.3
9.3
80
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
240 BHP - 409
6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
164 BHP
304 BHP
245
700
✓
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X2
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Temperature Display
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X2 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, Fortuner GX2 4X2 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X2 has a wheelbase of No data, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X2 uses Rear Drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL uses All Wheel Drive.