Fortuner GX2 4X4 vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
5 Doors
4795
4760 mm
1855
1930 mm
1835
1927 mm
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
10.3
10 Km/L
80
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
2.0 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
164 BHP
224 BHP
245
387 Nm
91
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X4
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X4 if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Fortuner GX2 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a wheelbase of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X4 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.