Fortuner GX2 4X4 vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
/
180 km/h
/
2698 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
4 Doors
4795
4800 mm
1855
1937 mm
1835
1962 mm
/
2950 mm
/
562 L
/
260 m
Fuel Economy
10.3
9.2 Km/L
80
79 L
/
9.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12
✓
/
✓
/
6
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
2.3 L - 3.0 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
181 - 418 BHP
6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
8-speed Automatic & Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
4 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
164 BHP
330 BHP
245
542 Nm
91
/
/
V
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X4
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Bronco Badlands 2.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- Attractive and iconic design
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Multiple engine options
Negative
- High price for top categories
- Limited internal storage space
- Significant fuel consumption
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X4 if you care more about price; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, Fortuner GX2 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a wheelbase of No data, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X4 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.