Fortuner GX2 4X4 vs CX5 High Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
210 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
17
19 Inch
4
/
4795
4550 mm
1855
1840 mm
1835
1680 mm
/
2700 mm
/
965 L
Fuel Economy
10.3
/
80
58
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12 Inch
✓
✓
✓
/
6
10
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
6-Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
1.9 L - 2.5 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
151 BHP - 190 BHP
6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
6-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
164 BHP
190 BHP
245
251 Nm
91
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X4
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
CX5 High
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X4 if you care more about overall equipment; choose CX5 High if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while CX5 High has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a wheelbase of No data, while CX5 High has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X4 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CX5 High uses Four-Wheel Drive.