Fortuner GX2 4X4 vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
17
19
4
/
4795
4810
1855
1925
1835
1742
/
2800
Fuel Economy
10.3
13
80
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
8
15.6
✓
/
✓
✓
6
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
AT
Chassis & Steering
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
-
147 BHP - 235 BHP
254 - 254
6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
AT & Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
164 BHP
254
245
390
91
/
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X4
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X4 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X4 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.