Fortuner GX2 4X4 vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
17
17
4
5
4795
4318
1855
1831
1835
1662
/
Flush Door
/
2610
Fuel Economy
10.3
/
80
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
Front Row Seats
Fabric
Cloth
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
Dual Front Airbags
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
10.25
✓
/
✓
✓
6
4
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
215/60 R17
265/65 R17
215/60 R17
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
111 BHP - 156
6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
164 BHP
111 BHP
245
/
91
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X4
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Tiggo 4 Pro COM
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X4 if you care more about power; choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a wheelbase of 2610. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X4 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM uses Front Drive.