Fortuner GX2 4X4 vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
17
18
4
5
4795
4500
1855
1842
1835
1746
/
Flush Door
/
2670
Fuel Economy
10.3
16.6
80
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
/
147 BHP - 235 BHP
/
6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
/
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
164 BHP
197 BHP
245
290
91
/
/
1.6L TDGI
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner GX2 4X4
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner GX2 4X4 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner GX2 4X4 has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner GX2 4X4 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.