Fortuner VX3-S 4X4 vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
/
193 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
4795
4355 mm
1855
1810 mm
1835
1625 mm
/
2670 mm
/
358 L
Fuel Economy
9.6
12.5 Km/L
80
63 L
/
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
✓
/
Rear
/
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
2.0 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
150 BHP
6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
4.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
235 BHP
150 BHP
376
197 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fortuner VX3-S 4X4
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fortuner VX3-S 4X4 if you care more about overall equipment; choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fortuner VX3-S 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 10.42, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fortuner VX3-S 4X4 has a wheelbase of No data, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fortuner VX3-S 4X4 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive.