Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid vs CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180 km/h
4
4
1462 cc
1790 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1055-1060
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
3995 mm
4390 mm
1765 mm
1795 mm
1550 mm
1565 mm
2520 mm
2640 mm
605 L
/
170 m
/
Fuel Economy
18 Km/L
16 Km/L
37 L
43 L
18 Km/L
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Fabric
Fabric
Digital
Digital
✓
/
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
8
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
7
7
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard LCD
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
4
6
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
195/60 R16
/
195/60 R16
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.8 L
103 BHP - 104 BHP
96 BHP - 121 BHP
Automatic
CVT
Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
1.8 L
Hybrid
Hybrid
None
None
4
4
104 BHP
96 BHP
137 Nm
142 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and modern exterior design
- Excellent fuel efficiency;
- Low maintenance cost
Negative
- Limited dynamic performance
- Suspension comfort needs to be improved
- Interior fittings are limited by technologies
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid if you care more about price; choose CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 5.56, while CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2520 mm, while CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) has a wheelbase of 2640 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid uses Front Wheel Drive, while CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.