Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid vs HS 2.0T Comfort Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

210 km/h

4

/

1462 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

1055-1060

/

5 Doors

/

3995 mm

4574 mm

1765 mm

1876 mm

1550 mm

1685 mm

2520 mm

2720 mm

605 L

463 L

170 m

/

Fuel Economy

18 Km/L

12.2 Km/L

37 L

55 L

18 Km/L

12.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

8

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

7

/

/

/

/

Standard LCD

/

/

/

4

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

195/60 R16

/

195/60 R16

/

Key Spec

1.5 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

103 BHP - 104 BHP

127 - 231

Automatic

9AT & Automatic & DCT

Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5 L

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

None

/

4

/

104 BHP

231 BHP

137 Nm

360 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • HS 2.0T Comfort

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHS 2.0T Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid if you care more about fuel economy; choose HS 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Suzuki | Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury 1.5T

Suzuki | Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Luxury

Suzuki | Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Luxury

Suzuki | Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid

VS

Maxus | D60 Max Elite 7 Seats

Suzuki | Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T High Deluxe (181 hp)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 5.56, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2520 mm, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Fronx GL 1.5L Hybrid uses Front Wheel Drive, while HS 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.