G318 Standard vs Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5010
4394 mm
1985
1874 mm
1895
1645 mm
2880
2636 mm
/
770 L
Fuel Economy
16.3
10.5 Km/L
/
51 L
/
10.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5
2.4 L
252 BHP
172 BHP - 180 BHP
DHT
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Engine
1.5
2.4 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
252 BHP
180 BHP
/
237 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
G318 Standard
Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and modern exterior design
- High off-road driving ability
- Advanced security features
Negative
- Higher fuel consumption compared to competitors
- Luggage space is limited
- Medium performance acceleration capability
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCompass 2.4L Longitude (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose G318 Standard if you care more about fuel economy; choose Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13, while Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, G318 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880, while Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2636 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. G318 Standard uses No data, while Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.