G318 Standard vs HS 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5010
4574 mm
1985
1876 mm
1895
1685 mm
2880
2720 mm
/
463 L
Fuel Economy
16.3
12.2 Km/L
/
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5
2.0 L - 2.0 L
252 BHP
127 - 231
DHT
9AT & Automatic & DCT
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
252 BHP
231 BHP
/
360 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
G318 Standard
HS 2.0T Comfort
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHS 2.0T Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose G318 Standard if you care more about fuel economy; choose HS 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, G318 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. G318 Standard uses No data, while HS 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.