G318 Standard vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
220
/
Dimensions
5
5
5010
4318
1985
1831
1895
1662
2880
2610
/
Flush Door
/
17
/
5
Fuel Economy
16.3
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
DHT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
1.5
1.5 L - 1.5 L
252 BHP
111 BHP - 156
DHT
Automatic & CVT
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
252 BHP
111 BHP
/
1.5L
Exterior
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
G318 Standard
Tiggo 4 Pro COM
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 4 Pro COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose G318 Standard if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a wheelbase of 2610. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. G318 Standard uses No data, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM uses Front Drive.