CarteaCompare CarsG700 Comfort vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD

G700 Comfort vs Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD Comparison

Car Information

4.6

8.0

34.13

/

Engine / Motor

/

190

/

6

Dimensions

5

8

5198

5046

2050

1975

1956

1795

2870

2900

1730

/

1730

/

230

/

/

470

Fuel Economy

11.6

9.4

100

74

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

35.4

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6

/

/

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

2 DHT

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

275/60 R20

/

275/60 R20

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.0

2.5 L - 3.5 L

694

250 BHP - 271 BHP

2 DHT

9AT & Automatic & CVT

Hybrid

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 6

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

3.5 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

694

271 BHP

795

340

/

V6 9AT

/

271 @ 6,400

/

340 @ 4,800

Technologies

6

/

/

/

/

/

SPORT/ECO/NORMAL

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • G700 Comfort

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Child Safety Monitoring System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Related comparisons

Editor's PickNissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose G700 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy; choose Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jetour | G700 Comfort

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

Jetour | G700 Comfort

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (AWD) Premium (7 Seats)

Jetour | G700 Comfort

VS

Tesla | Model Y Rear-Wheel Drive

Jetour | G700 Comfort

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2023 Standard Range

Jetour | G700 Comfort

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2024 Standard Range

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, G700 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.62, while Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, G700 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, G700 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2870, while Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. G700 Comfort uses Front Drive, while Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD uses All Wheel Drive.