CarteaCompare CarsG90 Executive vs 300 Challenger 2.0T

G90 Executive vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

190

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

Sliding Door

/

7

5 Seater

18

/

5280

4760 mm

1998

1930 mm

1845

1927 mm

3200

2750 mm

/

5 Doors

/

400 L

/

224 m

Fuel Economy

12.3

10 Km/L

70

75 L

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

Interior

7

/

LCD

/

Front Row Seats

/

PVC

Leather

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

Front Airbag - Driver, Front Airbag - Passenger, Driver's & Front Passenger's Side Airbags

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

12.3

/

/

/

/

6

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

Transmission

8AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Macpherson indepen-Suspension

/

5 Bar Link indepen-Suspension

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

2.0 L

160 BHP - 214 BHP

223 BHP - 342 BHP

8AT

Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

214 BHP

224 BHP

160

/

360

387 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • G90 Executive

    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Alert
    • Seat belt reminder
  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick300 Challenger 2.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose G90 Executive if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Maxus | G90 Executive

VS

Kia | Kia Carnival 2024 3.5L GDI L

Maxus | G90 Executive

VS

Kia | Kia Carnival 2018 3.3L Top

Maxus | G90 Executive

VS

Toyota | Toyota Previa 2022 2.4L S

Maxus | G90 Executive

VS

Toyota | Toyota Previa 2018 2.4L S

Maxus | G90 Executive

VS

Toyota | Toyota Previa 2021 2.4L S

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, G90 Executive has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, G90 Executive is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, G90 Executive has a wheelbase of 3200, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G90 Executive, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. G90 Executive uses Front Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.