GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
Chinese
/
/
190
/
4
Dimensions
5
5
4 Doors
/
4810 mm
4650
1880 mm
1905
1545 mm
1630
2750 mm
2775
/
1480
/
19
Fuel Economy
/
15.8
/
51
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
single-speed automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Independent Suspension
/
Torsion-beam Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.5
Electric
Gasoline
134BHP
202 BHP
225 Nm
305
Motor
8.5
/
Lithium-Ion
/
Key Spec
/
1.5
/
202 BHP
/
AT
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMage E1
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mage E1 if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E1, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh uses Front Wheel Drive , while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.