GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh vs Seal 6 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
Chinese
/
/
180
Dimensions
5
5
4 Doors
4
4810 mm
4830
1880 mm
1875
1545 mm
1495
2750 mm
2790
/
1630
/
491
Fuel Economy
/
16.95
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Dual
Infotainment
/
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
3.3
Transmission
single-speed automatic
eCVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Independent Suspension
/
Torsion-beam Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
1.5
Electric
Hybrid
134BHP
174
225 Nm
/
Motor
8.5
/
Lithium-Ion
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
161
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh
Seal 6 Design
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSeal 6 Design
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh if you care more about overall equipment; choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh has a fuel consumption of No data, while Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Seal 6 Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh uses Front Wheel Drive , while Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive.