GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1491 cc
1998 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4680 mm
4760 mm
1901 mm
1930 mm
1670 mm
1927 mm
2750 mm
2750 mm
55 L
400 L
160 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
55 L
75 L
13 Km/L
10 Km/L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Multi-Link Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L
138 BHP - 177 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
Automatic & DCT & DHT
Automatic
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
177 BHP
224 BHP
270 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS uses Front Wheel Drive , while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.