GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS vs BJ30e Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1491 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4680 mm
/
1901 mm
/
1670 mm
/
2750 mm
/
55 L
/
160 mm
/
Fuel Economy
55 L
/
13 Km/L
/
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
Android LCD
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Multi-Link Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
138 BHP - 177 BHP
154 BHP - 185
Automatic & DCT & DHT
7DCT & DHT & DHT
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
177 BHP
154 BHP
270 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
BJ30e
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS if you care more about overall equipment; choose BJ30e if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a fuel consumption of No data, while BJ30e has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while BJ30e has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS uses Front Wheel Drive , while BJ30e uses No data.