GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS vs iCAUR V27 Classic Comparison

Car Information

/

8.5

/

Electric

/

1.8

/

95

/

300

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1491 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4680 mm

5045

1901 mm

1976

1670 mm

1894

2750 mm

2900

55 L

/

160 mm

/

/

19"

/

/

Fuel Economy

55 L

/

13 Km/L

/

/

55

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

15.4"

/

/

/

/

8.88"

/

Dual

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

0.5

Transmission

Automatic

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

MacPherson

Multi-Link Wishbone

Multi Link

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Wheels/brakes

/

255/55 R19

/

255/55 R19

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

/

138 BHP - 177 BHP

248 - 450

Automatic & DCT & DHT

AT

Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater - 5 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5 L

1.5

Petrol

Electric

Single Turbo

/

4

/

177 BHP

248

270 Nm

300

Technologies

/

Snow, Sand, Etc

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

185

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
  • iCAUR V27 Classic

    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Driving Recorder
    • Rollover stability control
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS if you care more about price; choose iCAUR V27 Classic if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a fuel consumption of No data, while iCAUR V27 Classic has a fuel consumption of 1.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while iCAUR V27 Classic has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, iCAUR V27 Classic, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS uses Front Wheel Drive , while iCAUR V27 Classic uses Rear Drive.