GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

210

4

4

1491 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

4680 mm

4.574

1901 mm

1.876

1670 mm

1.685

2750 mm

2.720

55 L

463

160 mm

/

Fuel Economy

55 L

55

13 Km/L

/

/

12.2

Comfort

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Multi-Link Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

140 BHP - 177

127 - 231

Automatic & DCT & DHT

9AT & Automatic & DCT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5 L

2.0 L

Petrol

Petrol

Single Turbo

/

4

/

177 BHP

231 BHP

270 Nm

360

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
  • MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Temperature Display
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Limiter
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS if you care more about interior space; choose MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Maxus | D60 Executive 1.5L

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Toyota | Veloz GLX

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

BAIC | X7 Honor-LV5

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2.720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS uses Front Wheel Drive , while MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.