CarteaCompare CarsGAC EMKOO 1.5T GS vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM

GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1491 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

5

4680 mm

4500

1901 mm

1842

1670 mm

1746

2750 mm

2670

55 L

/

160 mm

/

/

Flush Door

/

18

Fuel Economy

55 L

/

13 Km/L

/

/

16.6

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

Fabric

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

12.3

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

6

Transmission

Automatic

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Multi-Link Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 1.6 L

138 BHP - 177 BHP

154 - 197 BHP

Automatic & DCT & DHT

6DCT AT & 7DCT

Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5 L

1.6 L

Petrol

Gasoline

Single Turbo

/

4

/

177 BHP

197 BHP

270 Nm

290

/

1.6L TDGI

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
  • Tiggo7 Pro Max COM

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS if you care more about price; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

GAC | GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC EMKOO 1.5T GS uses Front Wheel Drive , while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.