GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL vs H6 Active Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1999 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4680 mm

/

1901 mm

/

1670 mm

/

2750 mm

/

450 L

/

160 mm

/

Fuel Economy

/

14.9 km/L

55 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

Yes

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

10.25 Inch

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

Yes

Yes

Yes

/

/

/

/

/

4

/

No

/

es

/

Yes

/

Yes

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

8 + DTS

Transmission

Automatic

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Multi-Link Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Wheels/brakes

/

225/60 R18

/

225/60 R18

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

1500 L - 1998 L

140 BHP - 177

152 BHP - 235

Automatic & DCT & DHT

7DCT & Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

2.0L

Hybrid

Gasoline

None

/

4

4

138 BHP

201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm

180 Nm

320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm

/

Turbocharge

/

Turbocharged

/

DOHC

/

105

Technologies

/

/

/

Yes

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Yes

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • H6 Active

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickH6 Active

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL if you care more about overall equipment; choose H6 Active if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Kia | Kia Sportage 2023 1.6L LX (FWD)

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Maxus | D60 Max Elite 7 Seats

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Haval | H6 Deluxe 2026

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Haval | H6 Active

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Haval | H6 GT 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL has a fuel consumption of No data, while H6 Active has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while H6 Active has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL uses Front Wheel Drive , while H6 Active uses Front Drive.