GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL vs HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD Comparison

Car Information

/

6.9

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

210

4

4

1999 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

4680 mm

4630

1901 mm

1890

1670 mm

1663

2750 mm

2750

450 L

507

160 mm

/

Fuel Economy

/

13.5

55 L

65

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

9AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Multi-Link Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

138 BHP - 177 BHP

127 - 231

Automatic & DCT & DHT

9AT & Automatic & DCT

Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

2.0

Hybrid

Gasoline

None

/

4

/

138 BHP

231

180 Nm

370

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL if you care more about price; choose HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury 1.5T

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Luxury

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Luxury

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Maxus | D60 Max Elite 7 Seats

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T High Deluxe (181 hp)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL has a fuel consumption of No data, while HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL uses Front Wheel Drive , while HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.