GAC Empow 1.5T GS vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
185
4
/
1497 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4
4700 mm
4765
1850 mm
1837
1432 mm
1495
2730 mm
2720
480 L
500
120 mm
/
/
Flush Door
/
1500
/
17
Fuel Economy
50 L
48
13 Km/L
/
/
26
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
Sensatec Leather
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
Front Row
Infotainment
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
/
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
6
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
7WDCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
MacPherson
Multi-Link Wishbone
Torsion Beam
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L
170 BHP - 1497 BHP
177 BHP - 197 BHP
7-Speed DCT & 7WDCT
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
170 BHP
197 BHP
250 Nm
325
/
Plug in Hybrid
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC Empow 1.5T GS
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC Empow 1.5T GS if you care more about price; choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC Empow 1.5T GS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC Empow 1.5T GS has a wheelbase of 2730 mm , while Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC Empow 1.5T GS, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC Empow 1.5T GS uses Front Wheel Drive , while Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive.