CarteaCompare CarsGAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB vs Juke 1.0T

GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB vs Juke 1.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

180 km/h

4

4

1497 cc

999 cc

Chinese

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4410 mm

4210 mm

1850 mm

1800 mm

1600 mm

1595 mm

2650 mm

2636 mm

341 L

251 L

160 mm

179 m

Fuel Economy

47 L

52 L

15 Km/L

15 Km/L

/

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

Smart Entry

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

Fabric

Digital

Digital

Electric

Electric

Standard

Standard

/

/

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

Android LCD

/

/

7

/

/

6

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Multi-Link Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Key Spec

1.3 L - 1.5 L

1.0 L - 1.6 L

172 BHP - 202 BHP

115 BHP - 190 BHP

7DCT & Automatic & DCT

Automatic & Manual

Petrol & Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

LED

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

1.5 L

1.0 L

Petrol

Gasoline

Single Turbo

Single Turbo

4

4

172 BHP

115 BHP

270 Nm

180 Nm

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Juke 1.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB if you care more about price; choose Juke 1.0T if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion Basic

GAC | GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB

VS

GAC | GS3 1.3T GB

GAC | GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV

GAC | GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Enjoy

GAC | GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2019 1.6L Active

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of No data, while Juke 1.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2650 mm , while Juke 1.0T has a wheelbase of 2636 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive , while Juke 1.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.