GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB vs Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
218 km/h
4
4
1497 cc
1498 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4410 mm
4191 mm
1850 mm
1794 mm
1600 mm
1508 mm
2650 mm
2601 mm
341 L
405 L
160 mm
185 m
Fuel Economy
47 L
50 L
15 Km/L
12 Km/L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Multi-Link Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.0 L - 1.5 L
172 BHP - 202 BHP
116 BHP - 150 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & DCT
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
4
172 BHP
148 BHP
270 Nm
250 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB if you care more about price; choose Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2650 mm , while Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic has a wheelbase of 2601 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive , while Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic uses Front Wheel Drive.