CarteaCompare CarsGAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB vs Q3 35 TFSI

GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB vs Q3 35 TFSI Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

206 km/h

4

/

1497 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

4410 mm

4385 mm

1850 mm

2019 mm

1600 mm

1608 mm

2650 mm

2603 mm

341 L

460 L

160 mm

/

Fuel Economy

47 L

58 L

15 Km/L

15.4 Km/L

/

15.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Multi-Link Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Key Spec

1.3 L - 1.5 L

1.4 L - 2.0 L

174 - 202 BHP

150 BHP - 220 BHP

7DCT & Automatic & DCT

Automatic & Manual

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5 L

1.4 L

Petrol

Gasoline

Single Turbo

/

4

/

172 BHP

150 BHP

270 Nm

250 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Q3 35 TFSI

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickQ3 35 TFSI

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB if you care more about interior space; choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2650 mm , while Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC GS3 Emzoom 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive , while Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive.