GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

/

8 s

/

189

/

390

/

4810*1925*1742

Dimensions

5

7

1698

/

20"

19

4685

4810

1901

1925

1690

1742

2750

2800

Fuel Economy

11.1

13

55

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

10.1"

10.25

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

7"

10.25"

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

Infotainment

6

8

/

15.6

/

Battery/Charging

/

4

Transmission

8AT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Macpherson suspension

/

Multi-link suspension

/

/

Front Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

-

165 BHP - 248

254 - 254

8AT

AT & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.0L

Gasoline

Gasoline

248

254

/

Turbocharge

/

2.0T GDI

/

390

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

19 ADAS Functions

/

/

Eco + Normal + Sport

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL

    • Power Tailgate
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
  • Tiggo 9 Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

GAC | GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV)

GAC | GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL

VS

Honda | HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX

GAC | GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL

VS

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro Max COM

GAC | GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL has a wheelbase of 2750, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL uses No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.