GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
/
4
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1698
/
20"
/
4685
5004 mm
1901
1978 mm
1690
1802 mm
2750
2900 mm
/
5 Doors
/
470 L
Fuel Economy
11.1
9.4 Km/L
55
74 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.1"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
7"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
8AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Macpherson suspension
/
Multi-link suspension
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
165 BHP - 248
250 BHP - 271 BHP
8AT
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
248
271 BHP
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
/
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL
- Power Tailgate
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL if you care more about price; choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL has a wheelbase of 2750, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL uses No data, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.