GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL vs Q3 35 TFSI Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
206 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1698
/
20"
/
4685
4385 mm
1901
2019 mm
1690
1608 mm
2750
2603 mm
/
460 L
Fuel Economy
11.1
15.4 Km/L
55
58 L
/
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.1"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
7"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
8AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Macpherson suspension
/
Multi-link suspension
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.4 L - 2.0 L
165 BHP
150 BHP - 220 BHP
TBD
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
248
150 BHP
/
250 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL
- Power Tailgate
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Q3 35 TFSI
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ3 35 TFSI
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL if you care more about interior space; choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Q3 35 TFSI is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL has a wheelbase of 2750, while Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC GS4 MAX 2.0T+8AT AWD GL uses No data, while Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive.