CarteaCompare CarsGAC GS8 2.0T GT (2WD) vs Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

GAC GS8 2.0T GT (2WD) vs Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

206 km/h

4

4

1991 cc

1984 cc

Chinese

GCC

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4980 mm

4485 mm

1950 mm

1856 mm

1780 mm

1585 mm

2920 mm

2680 mm

450 L

530 L

200 mm

170 m

Fuel Economy

66 L

60 L

9 Km/L

11 Km/L

/

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

Smart Entry

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

Leather

Leather

Digital

Digital

Electric

Electric

Standard

Standard

/

/

/

/

Dual Zone

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

Android LCD

/

9

/

/

/

/

/

6

Transmission

AISIN 8AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Multi-Link Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

248 BHP - 332 BHP

/

8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & Automatic

/

Gasoline

/

TBD

/

7 - 7

/

Exterior

LED

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

2.0 L

2.0 L

Petrol

Gasoline

2.0TGDI

/

Single Turbo

Single Turbo

4

4

248 BHP

180 BHP

400 Nm

320 Nm

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC GS8 2.0T GT (2WD)

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
  • Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickQ3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC GS8 2.0T GT (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC GS8 2.0T GT (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC GS8 2.0T GT (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm , while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC GS8 2.0T GT (2WD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC GS8 2.0T GT (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive , while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.