Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase vs IS 300 Premier 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
5716 mm
4665 mm
2148 mm
1810 mm
1571 mm
1430 mm
3465 mm
2800 mm
490 L
480 L
/
4 Doors
/
140 m
Fuel Economy
6.5 Km/L
13 Km/L
82 L
66 L
6.5 Km/L
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.6 L - 6.8 L
2.0 L - 3.5 L
563 BHP - 593 BHP
241 BHP - 312 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
6.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
571 BHP
241 BHP
850 Nm
350 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
IS 300 Premier 2.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickIS 300 Premier 2.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase if you care more about interior space; choose IS 300 Premier 2.0L if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase has a fuel consumption of 15.38, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, IS 300 Premier 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase has a wheelbase of 3465 mm, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase uses All Wheel Drive, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.