Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase vs Stelvio Veloce Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
230 km/h
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
5716 mm
4680 mm
2148 mm
2160 mm
1571 mm
1670 mm
3465 mm
2818 mm
490 L
525 L
Fuel Economy
6.5 Km/L
11.2 Km/L
82 L
64 L
6.5 Km/L
11.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.6 L - 6.8 L
2.0 L - 2.9 L
563 BHP - 612 BHP
280 BHP - 510 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
6.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
571 BHP
280 BHP
850 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Stelvio Veloce
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStelvio Veloce
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase if you care more about interior space; choose Stelvio Veloce if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase has a fuel consumption of 15.38, while Stelvio Veloce has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, Stelvio Veloce is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase has a wheelbase of 3465 mm, while Stelvio Veloce has a wheelbase of 2818 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ghost 6.75T Extended Wheelbase uses All Wheel Drive, while Stelvio Veloce uses All Wheel Drive.